Probing Students's Understanding of Resonance
Sytil Murphy, Dyan McBride, Josh Gross and Dean Zollman
Resonant phenomena play a crucial role in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a widely used medical tool in today's society. The basic features of the resonance in MRI can be taught by looking at the resonance of a compass driven by an electromagnetic field. However, resonance in a oscillating magnetic field is not a phenomenon that is familiar to most students. Thus, as a precursor to creating instructional materials, we investigated how students applied their learning about resonance as traditionally taught to this novel system.
Showing posts with label paper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label paper. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Chini, Carmichael, Rebello, Puntambekar: NARST 2009
Future Elementaty Teachers Integrating Hypertext with Hands-on Experimentation in a Design-Based Context
Jacquelyn J. Chini, Adrian Carmichael, N. Sanjay Rebello
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506; USA
Sadhana Puntambekar
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706; USA
We discuss how future elementary teachers in a physics class progress through the CoMPASS (Concept Map Project-based Activity Scaffolding System) curriculum that facilitates learning by integrating hands-on and hypertext activities in a design-based context. We report on the criteria that participants use while making design predictions, their navigation strategies on the hypertext system, and what they learn about their design task after completing the hypertext and hands-on activities.
*This research is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences Award R305A080507.
Jacquelyn J. Chini, Adrian Carmichael, N. Sanjay Rebello
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506; USA
Sadhana Puntambekar
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706; USA
We discuss how future elementary teachers in a physics class progress through the CoMPASS (Concept Map Project-based Activity Scaffolding System) curriculum that facilitates learning by integrating hands-on and hypertext activities in a design-based context. We report on the criteria that participants use while making design predictions, their navigation strategies on the hypertext system, and what they learn about their design task after completing the hypertext and hands-on activities.
*This research is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences Award R305A080507.
Labels:
2009,
Carmichael,
Chini,
CoMPASS,
inclined planes,
NARST,
paper,
Poster,
pragmatic precision,
Puntambekar,
Rebello
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Zollman, Murphy, Stevens, Christel: GIREP-EPEC Plenary 2009
Web-based Pedagogical Assistance for Under-prepared Teachers of Physics Slides Paper
Dean Zollman & Sytil Murphy
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506; USA
Scott Stevens, & Michael Christel, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 152319 USA
Recently President Obama noted a serious concern about secondary science education in the United States. “Yet in high schools, more than 20 percent of students in math and more than 60 percent of students in chemistry and physics are taught by teachers without expertise in these fields.“ This problem is not new, so several years ago we begin a Web-based effort to address it. The Physics Teaching Web Advisory (Pathway) is an effort to demonstrate the ability to address pedagogical issues of many physics teachers via the Web. Pathway’s “Synthetic Interviews” are a unique way to engage inexperienced teachers in a natural language dialog about effective teaching of physics. These virtual conversations and related video materials are now providing pre-service and out-of-field in-service teachers with much needed professional development, and well-prepared teachers with new perspectives on teaching physics. The database is a growing digital library and now contains about 6,000 different recorded answers and over 10,000 question/answer pairs. An additional component is a collection of videos which can be used directly in the classroom. This collection includes both professional and teacher-produced videos. Unlike YouTube they are screened for usefulness before posting, but also will soon take advantage of the vast resources on YouTube and other similar sites. Pathway is available at http://www.physicspathway.org
Supported by the US National Science Foundation under Grants 0455772 & 0455813.
Dean Zollman & Sytil Murphy
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506; USA
Scott Stevens, & Michael Christel, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 152319 USA
Recently President Obama noted a serious concern about secondary science education in the United States. “Yet in high schools, more than 20 percent of students in math and more than 60 percent of students in chemistry and physics are taught by teachers without expertise in these fields.“ This problem is not new, so several years ago we begin a Web-based effort to address it. The Physics Teaching Web Advisory (Pathway) is an effort to demonstrate the ability to address pedagogical issues of many physics teachers via the Web. Pathway’s “Synthetic Interviews” are a unique way to engage inexperienced teachers in a natural language dialog about effective teaching of physics. These virtual conversations and related video materials are now providing pre-service and out-of-field in-service teachers with much needed professional development, and well-prepared teachers with new perspectives on teaching physics. The database is a growing digital library and now contains about 6,000 different recorded answers and over 10,000 question/answer pairs. An additional component is a collection of videos which can be used directly in the classroom. This collection includes both professional and teacher-produced videos. Unlike YouTube they are screened for usefulness before posting, but also will soon take advantage of the vast resources on YouTube and other similar sites. Pathway is available at http://www.physicspathway.org
Supported by the US National Science Foundation under Grants 0455772 & 0455813.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Hrepic, Zollman, Rebello: Journal of Science Education and Technology (2007)
Comparing Students’ and Experts’ Understanding
of the Content of a Lecture
Zdeslav Hrepic, Dean A. Zollman, and N. Sanjay Rebello Journal of Science Education and Technology 16, 213-224 (2007)
In spite of advances in physics pedagogy, the lecture is by far the most widely used format of instruction. We investigated students’ understanding and perceptions of the content delivered during a physics lecture. A group of experts (physics instructors) also participated in the study as a reference for the comparison. During the study, all participants responded to a written conceptual survey on sound propagation. Next, they looked for answers to the survey questions in a videotaped lecture by a nationally known teacher. As they viewed the lecture, they indicated instances, if any, in which the survey questions were answered during the lecture. They also wrote down (and if needed, later explained) the answer, which they perceived was given by the instructor in the video lecture. Students who participated in the study were enrolled in a conceptual physics course and had already covered the topic in class before the study. We discuss and compare students’ and experts’ responses to the survey questions before and after the lecture.
of the Content of a Lecture
Zdeslav Hrepic, Dean A. Zollman, and N. Sanjay Rebello Journal of Science Education and Technology 16, 213-224 (2007)
In spite of advances in physics pedagogy, the lecture is by far the most widely used format of instruction. We investigated students’ understanding and perceptions of the content delivered during a physics lecture. A group of experts (physics instructors) also participated in the study as a reference for the comparison. During the study, all participants responded to a written conceptual survey on sound propagation. Next, they looked for answers to the survey questions in a videotaped lecture by a nationally known teacher. As they viewed the lecture, they indicated instances, if any, in which the survey questions were answered during the lecture. They also wrote down (and if needed, later explained) the answer, which they perceived was given by the instructor in the video lecture. Students who participated in the study were enrolled in a conceptual physics course and had already covered the topic in class before the study. We discuss and compare students’ and experts’ responses to the survey questions before and after the lecture.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)